please rate
this thread
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
Posted by jonathanfigaro@gmail.com on May 20, 2009, 11:21 pm
  Hey everyone, i found this great article and I Let me know what you
think?
Let me know what you think?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/may/19/ida-fossil-missing-link

Posted by Paul Hovnanian P.E. on May 21, 2009, 1:38 pm
 jonathanfigaro@gmail.com wrote:


They've lost geek points IMO. They should have named her "404".

--
Paul Hovnanian  paul@hovnanian.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have gnu, will travel.

Posted by Michael A. Terrell on June 5, 2009, 10:03 am
 
"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote:

   Come on Paul.  Everyone knows that Archaeologists have their heads up
their pasts.


--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!

Posted by Bill Sloman on June 8, 2009, 4:28 am
 

Ida isn't human, and - as such - of no interest to archeologogists. The
people who found Ida are paleontologists, who tend to be interested in
earlier periods - still in the past, of course, so your pathetic word-play
would have worked just as well if you'd known the right name for the
scientists involved.

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen



Posted by Fred Bartoli on June 8, 2009, 5:13 am
 Paul Hovnanian P.E. a écrit :

Here's another fossil one...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peugeot_404



--
Thanks,
Fred.

  • Subject
  • Date