737 Max

snipped-for-privacy@columbus.rr.com wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

Damn you are thick.

The POTUS and the FAA grounded the flights of US airlines use of that plane. So, WE grounded that plane here.

Boeing MAKES them. Boeing will fix them.

But they didn't ground them, WE as a nation did. The rest of the nations of the world did individually as well.

Wher you got that Boeing did it I do not know.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno
Loading thread data ...

snipped-for-privacy@columbus.rr.com wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

Marketing?

There was a fix underway that got delayed by Trump's shutdown.

I am sure it is back underway again.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

And there my friend you have just contradicted yourself. You said before t hat they did not need fixed because it was pilot error. So if they need fix ed as you claim here why did they not get fixed after crash number 1. I anx iously await your flailing cursing tirade.

Reply to
bulegoge

snipped-for-privacy@columbus.rr.com wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

I did say it was piolt error. I did not twist it into that horseshit you just claimed I said though.

I never said that they did not need a fix.

I said the crashes were due to pilot error inasmuch as the pilots failed to right the planes.

There is still an issue with the control system.

I never said there wasn't. Fuck off and die claiming I said there was no need for a fix. I in fact said it was likely software.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

I see. There was a need for a fix but any crashes prior to the fix are on the crappy pilots. And if Donald Trump did not shut the government down then Boeing would have won the race against the clock where a fix was pitted against the next crash

Reply to
bulegoge

snipped-for-privacy@columbus.rr.com wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

NO, f*****ad! You abjectly do NOT see!

I did not say it was "on" anyone. I said there was likely a panic.

FOAD, boy.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

Ok let's try again..... There needs to be a fix but Boeing did the right th ing in telling pilots to deal with the problem by not panicking but the pil ots did not listen. But Donald Trump gets the blame because he extended the clock time in implementing the fix because Boeing was certain that if the government did not shut down they would have had the fix in before the next crash.. Statistics were on their side until trump screwed up the odds.

Reply to
bulegoge

snipped-for-privacy@columbus.rr.com wrote in news:0ef54960-16f6-4dc0-8bff- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

entire nation...

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

LOL, try pylons.

Stanchions hold the red felt ropes at the bank. Where you wait for the next available teller.

Little stands?

Pylons.

Reply to
Bonk

Fat pylons are attached to the top of the wing. Underside engines hang from pylons below the wing. Why does the length of a pylon, and not its footprint, now matter to you? Your problem was all about attaching anything to the top of the wing.

Reply to
Bonk

They're in the same position as everyone else's engine, but mounted to the wing and not to the fuselage. Saves pumping gas from wing tanks thru the fuselage to reach them.

Reply to
Bonk

Buildings that fall down vertically are helped with strategically placed explosives.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. 
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Reply to
Robert Baer

Bonk wrote in news:q6olfk$1c21$ snipped-for-privacy@gioia.aioe.org:

OK, so now suddenly you are a symantical utter retard, when a couple posts ago you acted like you didn't know what I was talking about.

You know what a pit is? You deserve to be in one.

Except you get maggots instead of lye.

Or I know... You should be buried up to your neck in a desert next to ant ant hill. That should do it for the little 'stanchion' the runs in that vast empty space between your ears.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

Bonk wrote in news:q6olfk$1c21$ snipped-for-privacy@gioia.aioe.org:

Looks like your "on the wing" argument went right up to the top of the pylon of shit you spew.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

Bonk wrote in news:q6olqf$1dlu$ snipped-for-privacy@gioia.aioe.org:

They looked to me like thin, skinny 'pylons'. Blades even.

I think you are projecting your personal size issues into this.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

Bonk wrote in news:q6om3e$1evg$ snipped-for-privacy@gioia.aioe.org:

You are clueless as to what the engineering decisions were, putz.

They are not "mounted to the wing" they are mounted on your precious pylons, WELL ABOVE the wing, and you are devoid of any grasp as to why.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

snipped-for-privacy@decadence.org wrote in news:q6odqj$70q$1 @gioia.aioe.org:

said

there

Yep...

A line from GOTG... "A little of both."

Quote:

"On Sunday, Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg issued a statement describing steps the company was taking to update its technology.

conclusions, Boeing is finalizing its development of a previously- announced software update and pilot training revision that will

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

I honestly had no idea what you looked at when you described it as "the plane pic was white paint" and "little stands".

You've gone through podiums, pedestals, stanchions, and little stands. All but "little stands" are easy enough to figure out. My best guess was that maybe a model of the engine was mounted to a little stand on the shop floor.

Reply to
Bonk

Argue with Honda about it then. They say their engines are on the wing.

Reply to
Bonk

Did Boeing put their 737 MAX fuselage ON the wing?

Reply to
Bonk

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.