This is the multisim 9 netlist:
rR1 1 3 1.100e+004
rR2 1 2 1.00e+002
qQ1 2 3 0 2N3904__BJT_NPN__1
VV1 1 0 dc 10 ac 0 0
.MODEL 2N3904__BJT_NPN__1 NPN(Is=6.734f Xti=3 Eg=1.11 Vaf=74.03 Bf=416.4 Ne=1.259
- Ise=6.734f Ikf=66.78m Xtb=1.5 Br=.7371 Nc=2 Isc=0 Ikr=0 Rc=1
- Cjc=3.638p Mjc=.3085 Vjc=.75 Fc=.5 Cje=4.493p Mje=.
2593 Vje=.75
- Tr=239.5n Tf=301.2p Itf=.4 Vtf=4 Xtf=2 Rb=10)
This is the circuitmaker 2000 netlist:
Q1 Q1_1 Q1_2 0 Q2N3904 V1 V1_1 0 DC 10V R2 Q1_1 V1_1 100 R1 Q1_2 V1_1 11k .SAVE V1_1 Q1_2 Q1_1 @q1[p] @q1[ic] @q1[ib] @q1[ie] @v1[p] v1#branch @v1[z] .SAVE @r2[p] @r2[i] @r1[p] @r1[i]
- Selected Circuit Analyses : .OP .TRAN 20n 5u 0 20n
*2N3904 Si 625mW 40V 200mA 300MHz pkg:TO-92B 1,2,3 .MODEL Q2N3904 NPN(IS=1.4E-14 BF=300 VAF=100 IKF=0.025 ISE=3E-13
- BR=7.5 RC=2.4 CJE=4.5E-12 TF=4E-10 CJC=3.5E-12 TR=2.1E-8 XTB=1.5 KF=9E-16 ) .END
I do notice some differences in the transistor model variables but I wouldn't know what they were or how they would effect the results. The circuitmaker results match much more closely with what I would expect (based on the transistor data sheet specs).