
- Thermal reliefs in plane connections
- 01-22-2008
![]() Re: Thermal reliefs in plane connections
| Brad Velander | 01-23-2008 |
Please Register and login to reply and use other advanced options
While checking a layout for a client I saw this for the umpteenth time:
Trace connections to a plane via thermal relief, not in a solder area
where it would thermally matter.
Question: Was it taught once upon a time that thermals must be used
everywhere? Or is there some other reason why it's done so often?
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
Trace connections to a plane via thermal relief, not in a solder area
where it would thermally matter.
Question: Was it taught once upon a time that thermals must be used
everywhere? Or is there some other reason why it's done so often?
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
Joerg,
I would have to believe that it is the old problem of a little knowledge
being misapplied by the uninitiated. A general comment on a rule or practice
then being taken to further extremes and actually misapplied. Sometimes it
may be software initiated, some packages actually have default rules that
start out your design with thermals on 'all' plane connections. i.e. Protel
P99SE (quite possibly the current AD software also), the default plane
connection style rule on a new PCB is for "Board" (everything, vias and
pads) to be thermally relieved. So the less knowledgable and experienced get
introduced to the silly practice by their acceptance of software package
defaults.
Certainly seems silly doesn't it? Then there is the problem of all the
discontinuities caused in the planes by these unnecessary thermal reliefs.
It is fairly common to see required thermal reliefs that are actually
starved connections because of all the unecessary reliefs impeding a good
connections to those required points.
--
Sincerely,
Brad Velander.

I would have to believe that it is the old problem of a little knowledge
being misapplied by the uninitiated. A general comment on a rule or practice
then being taken to further extremes and actually misapplied. Sometimes it
may be software initiated, some packages actually have default rules that
start out your design with thermals on 'all' plane connections. i.e. Protel
P99SE (quite possibly the current AD software also), the default plane
connection style rule on a new PCB is for "Board" (everything, vias and
pads) to be thermally relieved. So the less knowledgable and experienced get
introduced to the silly practice by their acceptance of software package
defaults.
Certainly seems silly doesn't it? Then there is the problem of all the
discontinuities caused in the planes by these unnecessary thermal reliefs.
It is fairly common to see required thermal reliefs that are actually
starved connections because of all the unecessary reliefs impeding a good
connections to those required points.
--
Sincerely,
Brad Velander.
Brad Velander wrote:

Yes, I've had one case where a supply plane split open into four parts
because the fab house took the liberty to "improve" the clearances. They
ended up doing another free blitz run for us.
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
Yes, I've had one case where a supply plane split open into four parts
because the fab house took the liberty to "improve" the clearances. They
ended up doing another free blitz run for us.
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
Joerg wrote:

It is easier to have a consistent style of trace to plane (or to
polygon) connection throughout the board. For many types of board,
thermal reliefs are just as good as direct connections - they are only a
problem if the relief wires are very thin, or if you are working at very
high frequency, high currents, or with high accuracy analogue signals.
Personally, I use thermals everywhere if I am doing a simple card, and
direct connections everywhere if it is higher speed or has smaller
geometries.
mvh.,
David
It is easier to have a consistent style of trace to plane (or to
polygon) connection throughout the board. For many types of board,
thermal reliefs are just as good as direct connections - they are only a
problem if the relief wires are very thin, or if you are working at very
high frequency, high currents, or with high accuracy analogue signals.
Personally, I use thermals everywhere if I am doing a simple card, and
direct connections everywhere if it is higher speed or has smaller
geometries.
mvh.,
David
- half a thermal
- January 29, 2008, 5:43 pm
- PCB Thermal Analysis
- January 31, 2008, 12:27 pm
- Thermal Relief in Protel
- August 22, 2005, 6:12 pm
- Thesis on electro-thermal MEMS
- September 17, 2005, 1:40 am
- Orcad - ground plane
- November 11, 2004, 1:07 am
- PCB design: Is silkscreen on ground plane okay?
- February 24, 2007, 2:00 pm
- Solid ground plane with ORCAD LAYOUT
- October 8, 2008, 11:09 am
- How to solve Protel "Warning - Pad/Via touching plane splitting primitives"?
- April 20, 2005, 10:31 pm






> Trace connections to a plane via thermal relief, not in a solder area
> where it would thermally matter.
> Question: Was it taught once upon a time that thermals must be used
> everywhere? Or is there some other reason why it's done so often?
> --
> Regards, Joerg
> http://www.analogconsultants.com/