Re: News.individual.net no longer free

There seems to be a lot of complaints though with this sort of arrangement.

Only by dills that dont have a clue. You qualify.

Since it was not the provider of goods or services that > actually accepted your card, you have no recourse

Wrong. They still have to show that you authorised the transaction, stupid.

because the third party who accepted your > card did provide the service you requested

Irrelevant on them having to show that you authorised the transaction.

- that is they accepted your card and passed a > payment onto the actual goods or service provider.

Irrelevant on them having to show that you authorised the transaction.

rowan194 wrote: > >> Looks like a standard third party biller to me. >> >> Instead of the content web site having a merchant account (and secure >> e-commerce facilities) they pass over to a third party. The big >> advantage with third party billing is that the webmaster of the site >> you're buying access to cannot see your card details. >> >> If for some reason they do bill you in error (or deliberately) then >> your bank can reverse the charge on your card. Without a signature on a >> sales receipt or contract for recurring billing the merchant cannot >> prove that you authorised the transaction. >
Reply to
Rod Speed
Loading thread data ...

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.