Re: gun laws

>

> > =A0> 2. The carriage of concealed arms for the purposes of self defence > =A0> should be allowed, where a person has undergone appropriate training > =A0> and can show a genuine requirement for such arms. > > What would you see as a genuine need? I'd see a need if you are actively > involved in the drug trade, if you are in a bikie gang, if you have > upset a bikie gang, or if you live in Melbourne and your name is Moran. > > If someone is going be authorised to carry a concealed firearm, then the > training should be to the same standard as the police (or at least the > standard that the police should be held to), including target > identification and marksmanship, and subject to annual re-qualification. > Also some limitation on the type of weapon carried. > > Whats anti-gun about that?

Why do you see the need to somehow associate drug dealers and bikie gangs with licenced firearms ownership? Does it somehow make you feel morally superior?

Reply to
John-Melb
Loading thread data ...

Two reasons I was awaiting a reply from Keithr, and this is where he hangs out.

An experiment, Trivial Trevor regularly posts his anti-gun and anti- gunowner rants on aus.electronics, and no-one complains, as soon as any alternative viewpoint goes up, a small select group on aus.electronics go absolutely feral.

You're sooking about what I posted, have you ever taken up the repeated posting of anti-gun diatribe on the same group with the poster?

Why is that?

y
e
.
Reply to
John-Melb

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.