Plimer and Silicon Chip

I bet you say that to all the boys. ;-)

--
The movie \'Deliverance\' isn\'t a documentary!
Reply to
Michael A. Terrell
Loading thread data ...

Bill posts common knowledge, while pretending that its a closely held state secret.

He is an unemployable old loser with a huge chip on his shoulder.

He claims that he couldn't find work because of his age, but no one wants to hire an inflamed asshole. So, he lived on "Unemployment", and his wife's income.

He is a moron who thinks he has some say about how other countries should be run, and pays tithes to the church of AGW and the Anti-Gun lobby.

He thinks the sun shines out of his ass, but its just another load.

--
The movie \'Deliverance\' isn\'t a documentary!
Reply to
Michael A. Terrell

Where did I say that? Are you on the same drugs as Phil?

--
The movie \'Deliverance\' isn\'t a documentary!
Reply to
Michael A. Terrell

One of the few things that survived the nuclear bomb in Hiroshima was an American made Mosler safe. After the war, the bank that owned it flew a tech over from the US to open it, and change the combination.

--
The movie 'Deliverance' isn't a documentary!
Reply to
Michael A. Terrell

I

did

Why did keithr want Trevor to take his "gun stuff" somewhere else?

Answer - "otherwise you'll have your alter ego and his little mates from APG swarming all over the place again."

I'll note that no-one here challenged Trevor previous anti-gun rants on aus.electronics, but were most upset at an alternative viewpoint being posted.

ve

You've challenged me a number of times about responding to Trevor's anti-gun rants on aus.electronics, have you ever challenged Trevor about posting them here in the first place ?

Reply to
John - Melb

Yet another lame attempt at misdirection. YAwnnn...

--
The movie \'Deliverance\' isn\'t a documentary!
Reply to
Michael A. Terrell

Yes, so? You're saying that is not what happens?

Not sure if I have in this group, but I definitely have in others. Actually, I regard Wilson as a complete nutter and no longer respond to any of his posts. Why don't you do the same?

--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.
Reply to
Dyna Soar

I'm saying the only reason Keithr had for complaining about Trevor's O/ T anti-gun rants was that he didn't want to see an alternative viewpoint being posted.

So you're not sure if you've ever challenged Trevor about his O/T anti- gun rants appearing on aus.electronics, but you've challenged me about countering them a number of times............Hmmm?

ny

Yes, I guess you'd like to see Trevor's anti-gun bile be posted without ever being challenged.

Reply to
John - Melb

Can't you read English? I have challenged him before, but I'm not sure if on this group. Anyway, I no longer respond to any of his posts, just as this will be the last time I respond to your paranoia. The two of you are so alike with your obsessions.

Bloody Hell, you're obsessing again, where did I state that? I'd prefer if Wilson just pissed off. Just as I'd prefer you to piss off, too. However, this is Usenet and, to quote Roddles, each of us get no say in where and what another posts. I do have a say, though, as to whom I respond. From now on you're not one of them. Go sit in the corner with Wilson. :-)

Bye, now go beat up a prisoner or something, perhaps that will vent your frustrations.

--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.
Reply to
Dyna Soar

if

s

are

Like I said, you're not sure if you've ever challenged his O/T posts HERE, but you've challenged me a number of times.

r if

wever,

From

)

Just as long as I don't respond to Trevor's anti-gun bile, right?

Not my style at all.

Reply to
John - Melb

re if

as

u are

fer if

However,

d

=A0From

:-)

But you've never told Trevor to piss off from here when he posts his O/ T rants, but you've told me to piss off a number of times?

r
Reply to
John - Melb

re if

as

u are

fer if

However,

d

=A0From

:-)

So, because I wont roll over and let Trevor post his bile without challenging it when and where it is posted, you're going to do a dummy spit and not "talk" to me anymore.

What a pathetic excuse for a human being

r
Reply to
John - Melb

Total = 35.57 to 36.57% Where are the rest?

The number of people killed, while very important wasn't all the sacrifices made. How about all the people rounded up and executed or held in prison camps? Civilians who died because their only local doctor was overseas, or medicines were not available? How about all the military who survived, but were disabled? Missing limbs, eyes, or suffered gut wounds that only let them eat a tablespoon of food at a time? Ones who lost their hearing, or the ability to breath without an oxygen tank? Returning military who lost everything they owned, and came home penniless, only to be told the government couldn't and wouldn't honor the promises made when they enlisted, or were drafted? Having the president order the military to shoot Veterans who refused to leave the capital? Read up on "The Bonus Army".

formatting link

--
The movie \'Deliverance\' isn\'t a documentary!
Reply to
Michael A. Terrell

Well, it seems you are. You asked Phil if he'd ever flown for the Russians in WWII. Was that an admission that you are talking out your arse?

Reply to
terryc

And yet no-one has invaded since the British.

So Australia is in no danger either then? (Aircraft attacks on Darwin, and miniature subs in Sydney Harbour not withstanding.)

MrT.

Reply to
Mr.T

Seems to me he is only claiming Phil hasn't. In fact not even that because he did ask.

MrT.

Reply to
Mr.T

that was 0.32% of USA population killed, 0.94% UK etc...

they weren't killed.

have you got any statistics?

everywhere had shortages and rationing.

seems about equal to the number killed for most forces. but significantly higher for NZ and India and slightly lower for UK.

sounds kind-of self inflicted.

Reply to
Jasen Betts

Did the US supply biplanes then? In fact it was a British biplane that crippled the Bismarck leading to its destruction.

Heres some more info on the Russian lend-lease

formatting link

Reply to
keithr

True, but thats where the majority of equipment supplied went

Reply to
keithr

Err,I took that to mean percentage of population or troops.

>
Reply to
terryc

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.