OT GW

Probably not. I've had exactly that setup in operation for quite a few years... Davis Vantage Pro wireless weather station with data logger (cheaper alternatives are now commonplace). The annual variation in the mean temperature for a single location is surprisingly large and will long remain statistically insignificant in terms of any global, or even local, trend.

I any case satellite derived data, which have been available since the

1970's, are likely to produce far more reliable results than data from ground stations. And of course historical data, like Trevor's 600,000 year claim, rely entirely on proxies which are both questionable and open to manipulation... look no further than Mann's hockey stick (and Trevor probably doesn't). ;)
--
John H
Reply to
John_H
Loading thread data ...

Trevor Wilson wrote: .......................

Funny how you always choose to divert discussion away from ior ignore the threads where you don't want to deal with reality. Where you firmly planted both feet in your mouth.

You appear to think yourself not answerable for your comments. Perhaps non compus mentis? ======================================================= LOL.....non compus mentis? = Bernd Felsche? ;>) Cheers DAVO

Reply to
<joe

Having been a research assistant in my earlier days, I can certainly attest to that. The things I saw happen... ===================================================== ROFLMAO...is that what happened to you? Thought you were taking a Bex powder for that headache?? Cheers DAVO

Reply to
<joe

Your name made me LOL.

Reply to
Clocky

**How the f*ck would you know? You have not read the IPCC reports. The IPCC reports are the premier documents in this area. You cannot claim that there are qualified comments on both sides, if you have not bothered reading one of those sides.

Trevor Wilson

formatting link
================================================================ Touché........Trev 1024 .... Noddy nil that's a big fat zero for you Darren. Time to give up pal. Cheers DAVO

Reply to
<joe

WTF is wrong with you?

I'll bet you're the type that gets paranoid/jealous when a group of friends get together, thinking they're talking about you behind your back.

Reply to
Jeßus

It's got some major paranoid delusional thing going on.....

Give that man a cigar :)

--
Regards,
Noddy.
Reply to
Noddy

Maybe you should have a word with the Pope about birth control.

Reply to
:)

As the Norwegian Prime Minister told me last month:-

"We don?t have a mining tax, we have a tax that?s very different."

and

"I think it?s very dangerous to compare our oil and gas tax system with a mining system."

You are an idiot. (he didn't tell me that, he doesn't know you)

Norway does not have a mining tax.

So instead of a 50% super profits tax, as you claim, they don't have one at all. (By the way, their scheme for oil and gas is deducted from their taxable income too, unlike the MRRT).

As usual, rather than check your facts, you operate from the assumption that you are correct, and therefore may claim as you wish, because you must be right.

Spoken like a true extremist...

Quite right - they only exist to pay money to us - their shareholders only buy their shares as a form of charity to delusional cretins.

Cloud cuckoo land is your permanent residence.

--
Cheers,
Paul Saccani
Perth, Western Australia.
Reply to
Paul Saccani
[snip]

This sounds as though you are saying that Australian mining companies have to pay company tax on the money that they contribute via the MRRT. Is that what you mean?

[snip]
Reply to
David Segall

Well, no - the schemes are completely different and not comparable.

They are applied at different stages.

--
Cheers,
Paul Saccani
Perth, Western Australia.
Reply to
Paul Saccani

Trevor - for some reason my news-server didn't pick up your reply. I am aware that you _did_ reply, by virtue of the fact Paul replied to your reply. But when I try and click on it, it responds that the post (ss far as the server is concerned) is non-existant (or whatever the right terminology is).

I have found the post via google groups, I'll poar a reply soon, I just haven't got time (ironically finding the post, and typing this one cost me what time I had left!)

-- John McKenzie

snipped-for-privacy@aol.com snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com snipped-for-privacy@hotmail.com snipped-for-privacy@earthlink.com snipped-for-privacy@aol.com snipped-for-privacy@whitehouse.gov snipped-for-privacy@whitehouse.gov snipped-for-privacy@accc.gov.au snipped-for-privacy@ftc.gov admin@loopback snipped-for-privacy@iprimus.com.au $LOGIN@localhost I knew Sanchez before they were dirty snipped-for-privacy@mailloop.com $USER@$HOST $LOGNAME@localhost -h1024@localhost snipped-for-privacy@msn.com snipped-for-privacy@federalpolice.gov.au snipped-for-privacy@psinet.com snipped-for-privacy@asio.gov.au $USER@localhost snipped-for-privacy@sprint.com snipped-for-privacy@fbi.gov snipped-for-privacy@cia.gov

Reply to
John McKenzie

ROTFL. Occasionally I read your posts. Invariably I end up asking myself why the hell do I bother. But yes, that's my own fault for not learning from experience.

And learn how to edit your replies.

Reply to
Jeßus

What a load of rubbish, like almost everywhere the political system consists 2 controlled parties, and one of them always gets power either outright or with the support of smaller parties who cannot wait to sell out. Get into the real world. If they were truly working for the public, for starters they would immediately strike down bad laws introduced by the previous party, default on debts (or at least the interest on them) taken out by a previous party that were made illegally, (this would be great as it would ensure that the banksters never made a bad loan to the government for bad policy again) made against the public interest, against the constitution, against the will of the people, or irresponsibly but these things rarely if ever happen and at best a law will be watered down, and not completely removed. The fact is that in many ways they work together as a left fist, right fist, or "good cop, bad cop" to simply screw the public.

In most cases, corporate and/or banking needs are fulfilled, as these are the people who pay them off and/or can make or break them via privately owned commercial media. You and I are FORCED to pay them money via the tax system, we cannot refuse if dissatisfied with our leaders or opt out of any service we are getting if dissatisfied at its effectiveness or value for money. The latest example being Harvey Norman and co who wanted the GST introduced on private purchases online shipped from overseas. This is already being investigated, and will probably be brought in in some form even though I doubt that many of the public support it.

The fact that they do not represent the public opinion can be clearly shown with Gillard and the Carbon Tax, as well as many other things over the years including the middle east wars. The public now is little more than a glorified group of slaves that are allowed every so often to select one of two masters that will boss them and push them around. Wake up, You and Trevor sound like you are living in some past stone age.

ROTFL, to a guy who believes that animal farts, and essential services like electrical generation and use of cars is catastrophically warming the earth and will kill us all.

Reply to
kreed

As is proving it and having you acknowledge your errors. The latter chasm seems to be a vastly larger one than the former.

--
Cheers,
Paul Saccani
Perth, Western Australia.
Reply to
Paul Saccani

Mr. Forrest does not own FMG, and FMG has considerable losses from start-up to be recouped. You are a ridiculous little man.

And by evil, you mean "does not agree with the T. Wilson world view and puts money behind that disagreement". You sad, little envious fellow.

Yes, lets, someone needs to be your whipping boy.

Assuming no political input, presumably....

--
Cheers,
Paul Saccani
Perth, Western Australia.
Reply to
Paul Saccani

Well you say you would like more than two parties.

Why didn't you put here on your list. We have many, many political parties?

Shouldn't you look at what happens in places with so many parties?

More is better isn't it?

We have 2 PMs two deputy PMs two of everything really, see how well it works. Everyone wants to be boss, even the prior (or is it current) ruling party is being split into two to make more parties.

Divide and rule is the motto here.

--
Brad Leyden
6° 43.5816' S 146° 59.3097' E  WGS84
To mail spam is really hot but please
reply to thread so all may benefit
(or laugh at my mistakes)
Reply to
Buzz^|

I don't believe I did.

The answers to the constitutional questions are going to be interesting...

--
Cheers,
Paul Saccani
Perth, Western Australia.
Reply to
Paul Saccani

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.