The history of this thread simply does not tally with your assessment.
I posed, what I thought was, a perfectly simple request for information and made no claim about my knowledge of electronics. I posed it here, simply because I was unable to Google a design myself.
Nearly all respondents reacted in an abusive manner to my request for an AC/AC power supply design. Phil was especially abusive and successively claimed:
a) That I did not have an application which required 9VAC input. Re:
Me> Yes, I really do need 9 VAC for my application.
Phil> ** BOLLOCKS you do !!
It isn't clear to me how he could be so adamant about my application's input voltage, since I had quite patently NOT included any information about the application in my original request. I can only surmise that he either:
i) Wrongly concluded that I meant 9VDC and was being defensive about it. ii) Wrongly concluded that 9VAC applications do not exist. (and that was why I could not have one).
But whichever it may be, he was WRONG on both counts and he was being extremely offensive to me, WHILST being WRONG. Apparently he is of the persuasion that
b) That my explanation for needing 9VAC was physically impossible. Re:
Me > Yes, it is a pair of half-wave rectifiers which DOUBLE the voltage. 9 VAC Me > in and +/-15 VDC out AFTER regulation.
Phil> ** Totally impossible bollocks !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Totally impossible only has one meaning and his reaction is consistent with the first presumption (i) above, IE. he believed that 9VAC applications DO NOT EXIST.
c) I didn't think it was possible for him to make his position MORE implausible, but in his latest effort to recover lost credibility, he does just that.
Me> Apparently (because I had to look it up) Charge Pump devices work by Me> electronically switching the polarity of the capacitors. IE "the capacitor Me> is disconnected from the original charging voltage and reconnected with Me> its negative terminal to the original positive charging voltage".
Phil> ** Exactly what the diodes do when the AC polarity changes.
It seems totally incongruent with this group's behaviour that he can make such STATEMENTS and totally escape any criticism. Do I really have to explain why he is WRONG again? Go on, make me:
I certainly don't want to risk being labelled "Arrogant" again.
BLAHHHHH, HA HA HA!!!