Do you have a question? Post it now! No Registration Necessary
- Subject
- Posted on
Re: Capacities of C size NIMH batteries compared to AA.
Interestingly, the best Energizer NiMH C cells are only 2500mAh rated,
same as their AA cells (@ 500mA CC discharge to 1V).
Compare the data sheets of both and the discharge curves are identical
up to and including 2C.
http://data.energizer.com/PDFs/nh15-2500.pdf
http://data.energizer.com/PDFs/nh35-2500.pdf
The only spec difference is internal resistance and impedance, which
are both lower in the C cell of course.
Claim of 6000 here:
http://www.batteryjunction.com/tpeh-t6000.html
but no data sheet to back it up.
Dave.
Re: Capacities of C size NIMH batteries compared to AA.
"Mauried"
** Firstly - the volume ratio from AA to C is close to 3:1.
It would be rare to find a C cell with 3 times the capacity of the BEST
available AA of the same chemistry class.
So there is nothing " wrong ".
The explanation lies in market forces:
AA cells would have to be easily the highest selling size by FAR - as a
result it is also the part of the market where there is the fiercest
competition for top performance ( Eg - Duracell have been fighting
Energizer over it for decades with saturation TV marketing ).
No similar thing exists with C or D sizes - so cell makers have much less
motive to go to the same efforts with them.
Another example is with "sub C" size Ni-Cd cells that way outperform similar
C size cells - cos "sub C " is what the RC hobbies use.
..... Phil
Re: Capacities of C size NIMH batteries compared to AA.
Ok Volume of a cylinder = Pi*r*r*l
So if L and Pi are the same the difference is r*r (of C size) / r*r (AA)
size
Therefore 13x13 / 6.75x6.75 = ratio of 3.71:1 or just under 4:1 ratio..
Sorry for the school stuff but it was 35 years ago since I did that so I
was interested if I still had it in me.
Cu
Mik
Re: Capacities of C size NIMH batteries compared to AA.
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 02:12:58 GMT, snipped-for-privacy@tpg.com.au (Mauried) put
finger to keyboard and composed:
On a slight tangent, I was curious as to how other cell chemistries
stack up in mAh per unit volume.
Here are CRxxyy lithium 3V coin cells:
http://www.maxell.co.jp/e/products/industrial/battery/cr/index.html
xx = diameter in mm
yy = thickness in 10ths of mm
I suspect that their mAh rating is proportional to their internal
thickness, ie after allowing for the metal casing, and assuming that
the dimensions of the electrodes can be ignored.
So if we take the biggest and smallest of the 20mm cells, we have ...
CR2032 - 220mAh
CR2012 - 50mAh
Let d be the thickness of the casing.
Then (3.2-d)/(1.2-d) = 220/50
... which gives ...
d = 0.612mm
So one would expect that a CR2016 battery would be rated at ...
(1.6-d)/(1.2-d) x 50 = 84mAh (actual = 90mAh)
... and a CR2025 would be rated at ...
(2.5-d)/(1.2-d) x 50 = 161mAh (actual = 170mAh)
As for diameter, comparing a CR2016 (90mAh) with a CR1616 (55mAh), we
get ...
rating of CR1616 = rating of CR2016 x (15.4 / 19.4) ^2 = 57mAh
... which tallies quite well.
I then checked out the NiMH rechargeable specs at ...
http://data.energizer.com /
part number Size mAh Diam Height
---------------------------------------------
H12-850mAh AAA 850 10.5 44.5
H15-2000mAh AA 2000 14.5 50.5
H35-2500mAh C 2500 26.2 50.0
H50-2500mAh D 2500 34.2 61.5
If we calculate the expected capacity of an AA battery when compared
with an AAA, using only external dimensions, we get ...
850 x (50.5/44.5) x (14.5/10.5)^2 = 1840mAh
After allowing for 0.6mm casing thickness, we get ...
850 x (49.9/43.9) x (13.9/9.9)^2 = 1905mAh
This makes sense, but the C and D sizes are a mystery. It seems to me
that, with no change to the chemistry at all, the manufacturer could
easily fit three AA cells inside a D package, resulting in a 6000mAh
capacity. But then the cost would be 3x ...
In fact I see that WES have tagged 6500mAh NiMH batteries (code RB536)
at $36.50 each.
Maybe the C and D rechargeables are just AA cells in C and D packages,
for cost reasons.
- Franc Zabkar
finger to keyboard and composed:
On a slight tangent, I was curious as to how other cell chemistries
stack up in mAh per unit volume.
Here are CRxxyy lithium 3V coin cells:
http://www.maxell.co.jp/e/products/industrial/battery/cr/index.html
xx = diameter in mm
yy = thickness in 10ths of mm
I suspect that their mAh rating is proportional to their internal
thickness, ie after allowing for the metal casing, and assuming that
the dimensions of the electrodes can be ignored.
So if we take the biggest and smallest of the 20mm cells, we have ...
CR2032 - 220mAh
CR2012 - 50mAh
Let d be the thickness of the casing.
Then (3.2-d)/(1.2-d) = 220/50
... which gives ...
d = 0.612mm
So one would expect that a CR2016 battery would be rated at ...
(1.6-d)/(1.2-d) x 50 = 84mAh (actual = 90mAh)
... and a CR2025 would be rated at ...
(2.5-d)/(1.2-d) x 50 = 161mAh (actual = 170mAh)
As for diameter, comparing a CR2016 (90mAh) with a CR1616 (55mAh), we
get ...
rating of CR1616 = rating of CR2016 x (15.4 / 19.4) ^2 = 57mAh
... which tallies quite well.
I then checked out the NiMH rechargeable specs at ...
http://data.energizer.com /
part number Size mAh Diam Height
---------------------------------------------
H12-850mAh AAA 850 10.5 44.5
H15-2000mAh AA 2000 14.5 50.5
H35-2500mAh C 2500 26.2 50.0
H50-2500mAh D 2500 34.2 61.5
If we calculate the expected capacity of an AA battery when compared
with an AAA, using only external dimensions, we get ...
850 x (50.5/44.5) x (14.5/10.5)^2 = 1840mAh
After allowing for 0.6mm casing thickness, we get ...
850 x (49.9/43.9) x (13.9/9.9)^2 = 1905mAh
This makes sense, but the C and D sizes are a mystery. It seems to me
that, with no change to the chemistry at all, the manufacturer could
easily fit three AA cells inside a D package, resulting in a 6000mAh
capacity. But then the cost would be 3x ...
In fact I see that WES have tagged 6500mAh NiMH batteries (code RB536)
at $36.50 each.
Maybe the C and D rechargeables are just AA cells in C and D packages,
for cost reasons.
- Franc Zabkar
--
Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.
Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.
Re: Capacities of C size NIMH batteries compared to AA.
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:30:54 +1100, Franc Zabkar
The weight may be the clue.
I've now added weight and surface area (SA) to the table.
part number Size mAh Diam Height Weight SA Net Wgt
------------------------------------------------------------------
H12-850mAh AAA 850 10.5 44.5 13 1641 9.5
H15-2000mAh AA 2000 14.5 50.5 30 2631 24.3
H35-2500mAh C 2500 26.2 50.0 66 5194 54.8
H50-2500mAh D 2500 34.2 61.5 73 8445 54.8
Assuming that casing thickness is the same for all cells, and assuming
that the only difference between the C and D cells is the casing, and
ignoring the weight of the electrodes, then a difference in the
surface area of 3251 sq mm corresponds to a weight difference of 7g.
This is 0.00215 g/mm2.
Based on this figure, I've deducted the weight of the casing, computed
the net weight of electrolyte, and added it to the table.
Assuming that the mAh rating is proportional to the weight of
electrolyte, then comparing the AA battery with the AAA we have ...
rating of AA battery = 850 x 24.3/9.5 = 2174 mAh
This still makes sense, but the C and D cells appear to have about
twice as much electrolyte as the AA, or maybe some inert substance is
adding to the weight to make it feel like the "correct" weight.
- Franc Zabkar
The weight may be the clue.
I've now added weight and surface area (SA) to the table.
part number Size mAh Diam Height Weight SA Net Wgt
------------------------------------------------------------------
H12-850mAh AAA 850 10.5 44.5 13 1641 9.5
H15-2000mAh AA 2000 14.5 50.5 30 2631 24.3
H35-2500mAh C 2500 26.2 50.0 66 5194 54.8
H50-2500mAh D 2500 34.2 61.5 73 8445 54.8
Assuming that casing thickness is the same for all cells, and assuming
that the only difference between the C and D cells is the casing, and
ignoring the weight of the electrodes, then a difference in the
surface area of 3251 sq mm corresponds to a weight difference of 7g.
This is 0.00215 g/mm2.
Based on this figure, I've deducted the weight of the casing, computed
the net weight of electrolyte, and added it to the table.
Assuming that the mAh rating is proportional to the weight of
electrolyte, then comparing the AA battery with the AAA we have ...
rating of AA battery = 850 x 24.3/9.5 = 2174 mAh
This still makes sense, but the C and D cells appear to have about
twice as much electrolyte as the AA, or maybe some inert substance is
adding to the weight to make it feel like the "correct" weight.
- Franc Zabkar
--
Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.
Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.
Re: Capacities of C size NIMH batteries compared to AA.
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:30:48 GMT, snipped-for-privacy@tpg.com.au (Mauried) put
finger to keyboard and composed:
You can use an 'AA to C' or 'AA to D' type battery converter:
http://www.batterylogic.co.uk/battery-converters.asp
Or, in the case of a D cell, you could bundle 3 tagged AAs and solder
the 3 tags together at both ends.
BTW, this is what an AA NiMH battery looks like in cross section:
http://data.energizer.com/PDFs/nickelmetalhydride_XSection.pdf
http://web.archive.org/web/20030314120132/http://data.energizer.com/batteryinfo/cross_sections_for_manuals/csnimh.pdf
I haven't been able to find a similar view for other sizes, though.
- Franc Zabkar
finger to keyboard and composed:
You can use an 'AA to C' or 'AA to D' type battery converter:
http://www.batterylogic.co.uk/battery-converters.asp
Or, in the case of a D cell, you could bundle 3 tagged AAs and solder
the 3 tags together at both ends.
BTW, this is what an AA NiMH battery looks like in cross section:
http://data.energizer.com/PDFs/nickelmetalhydride_XSection.pdf
http://web.archive.org/web/20030314120132/http://data.energizer.com/batteryinfo/cross_sections_for_manuals/csnimh.pdf
I haven't been able to find a similar view for other sizes, though.
- Franc Zabkar
--
Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.
Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.
Site Timeline
- » [OT] Totally OT: Palin for president
- — Next thread in » Electronics Down Under
- » Qantas Incident & laptops
- — Previous thread in » Electronics Down Under
- » Dang - missed Earth Hour again
- — Newest thread in » Electronics Down Under
- » OT: Snowy Hydro
- — Last Updated thread in » Electronics Down Under
- » OpAmp design - from theory to practice
- — The site's Newest Thread. Posted in » Electronics Design
- » Convertisseur hard-rock
- — The site's Last Updated Thread. Posted in » Electronics (French)